In a recent decision in Golik v. Erie Ins. Exch., 2023 PA Super 150 (Aug. 7, 2023)(approved for publication, no citation yet available), the Superior Court of Pennsylvania considered as a matter of first impression the question of whether a first named insured’s...
“Maintenance” under § 240(1) Sparks Split Decision in 4th Department
In a recent decision, the Fourth Department reversed a Supreme Court, Erie County Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on liability pursuant to Labor Law § 200 (“codified negligence”) and denying defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment...
Supreme Court Rejects Review of Challenge to UM/UIM “Coordination of Benefits” Provision
Last year, Glen Shikunov of McCormick & Priore, P.C. successfully litigated an appeal on a matter of first impression in the Superior Court in Erie Ins. Exch. v. Backmeier, 287 A.3d 931 (Pa. Super. 2022) wherein the Court rejected an attempt by a Plaintiff to...
“I don’t know. I just ‘work’ ‘here’.”
In a pair of recent cases, the Second Department considered what “work” is “ancillary” to activity falling under the purview of Labor Law § 240(1). By way of background, Labor Law § 240(1), also known notoriously as “The Scaffold Law,” protects workers from...
Fourth Department Highlights Departments’ Split on 12 NYCRR § 23-4.2(k)
In a recent decision The Fourth Department reversed a Supreme Court Order, holding that Industrial Code provision 12 NYCRR § 23-4.2(k) is not sufficiently specific to support a Labor Law § 241(6) cause of action. We note, Labor Law § 241(6) claims are required to be...
Unraveling the Mysteries of the Statute of Limitations in UM/UIM Claims
Before 2017, the question of when the statute of limitations accrued for uninsured motorist (“UM”) and underinsured motorist (“UIM”) claims was relatively straightforward: UM/UIM claims accrued when either the insured sustained bodily injury in an accident and knew of...
Pennsylvania Superior Court Rejects Availability of Attorneys’ Fees in First Party Medical Benefits Cases Involving Peer Reviews
In a recent decision in Turnpaugh Chiropractic Health & Wellness Ctr., P.C. v. Erie Ins. Exch., 2023 PA Super 99 (June 8, 2023), the Superior Court of Pennsylvania considered, among other things, whether the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Laws...
Federal Court Refuses to Strike Regular Use Exclusion in Liability Policies
As was the case in Gallagher v. GEICO Indem. Co., 201. A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 265 A.3d 794 (Pa. Super. 2021) has spawned legal uncertainty and questions about the application of the decision....
If it’s Broken, Fix it: Expanding the Scope of Contractor’s Liability to Third Persons for All Defects, Patent or Latent
Recently, in Brown v. City of Oil City, 294 A.3d 413 (2023), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was asked to determine whether Section 385 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts imposes liability on a contractor to a third party whenever the contractor creates a...